作者：辛石戏 来源：原创 发布日期：08-23
一 | Korean dramas weave stories of love and longing. Their meticulously crafted narratives navigate through tales of love, heartbreak and everlasting friendships. Having said that, these scripted romances often blossom into real-life fairytales. From the beloved Song-Song couple whose onscreen chemistry sparked a whirlwind romance to the saddening breakup of Lee Hyeri and Ryu Jun Yeol, whose love story melted hearts both on and off the screen, we'll dive into the highs and lows of some real life love sagas that initiated from our favorite K-dramas. Take a look at our list of the K-drama couples who dated offscreen and have made headlines for their romance! In This Article 1. Hyun Bin and Son Ye Jin2. Lee Hye Ri and Ryu Jun Yeol3. Song Joong Ki and Song Hye Kyo4. Nam Joo Hyuk and Lee Sung Kyung5. Ki Tae Young and Eugene6. Park Si Eun and Jin Tae Hyun7. Kim Bum and Moon Geun Young8. Lee Min Ho and Park Min Young9. Ahn Jae Hyun and Koo Hye Sun10. Ji Sung and Lee Bo Young11. Lee Joon and Jung So Min12. Lee Joon Gi and Jeon Hye Bin14. Kim Woo Bin and Shin Min Ah15. Ryu Soo Young and Park Ha Sun 1. Hyun Bin and Son Ye Jin The cross-border lovestory Crash Landing On You received high praise and remains one of the most-watched K-dramas of all time. The leads, Hyun Bin and Son Ye Jin who portrayed the roles of Ri Jeong Hyeok and Yoon Se Ri fell in love in the drama and in real life as well. However, 2 years before the drama was released, the two were seen in the thriller movie titled The Negotiation. While they characters were at loggerheads, some behind-the-scenes photos suggested that the two developed a strong camaraderie.They confirmed their relationship in January 2021 and announced their marriage in March 2022. The couple shared some glamorous photos from their private wedding on social media.That’s not all, they also became parents to a baby boy in November 2022. While they have been reluctant to share pictures of their baby’s face on social media, Ye Jin often posts glimpses without revealing his facial features. 2. Lee Hye Ri and Ryu Jun Yeol Lee Hye Ri and Ryu Jun Yeol starred together in the slice-of-life K-drama Reply 1988. While the duo did not end up together in the series, fans were elated knowing they were dating each other. They began dating in 2017 but kept their relationship mostly private. In an interview in 2019, Hye Ri subtly mentioned that she finds joy in his company.However, after going strong for 6 years, they recently experienced a public breakup when rumors of a romance between Han So Hee and Ryu Jun Yeol surfaced online. 3. Song Joong Ki and Song Hye Kyo The main couple in Descendants Of The Sun, Song Joong Ki and Song Hye Kyo tied the knot in October 2017. The beloved Song-Song couple had a palpable onscreen chemistry and looked undeniably breathtaking off screen.While at the beginning of their relationship, the couple ignored romance rumors and kept their affair extremely private, the two admitted to getting married sometime later and released individual statements to share the news with their fans. However, their separation rumors began surfacing online and Joon Ki’s lawyer later revealed that they have filed for divorce. Hye Ko’s agency further noted that the two were “unable to overcome their differences” and decided to part ways. 4. Nam Joo Hyuk and Lee Sung Kyung Nam Joo Hyuk and Lee Sung Kyung were the IT couple onscreen and offscreen. They starred together in the popular K-drama Weightlifting Fairy Kim Bok Joo where their lovable chemistry was the highlight. The couple shared adorable photos of them spending quality time with each other. While their relationship was confirmed in April 2017, it was short-lived and they officially split up in August of the same year. 5. Ki Tae Young and Eugene The star couple, who were seen together in the 2009 drama Seeking Love, announced their marriage in May 2011. However, they had denied rumours of romance and marriage previously, but fans were quick to notice that they had feelings for each other. Interestingly, they are still married and have two adorable daughters. 6. Park Si Eun and Jin Tae Hyun The Pure Pumpkin Flower Park Si Eun and Jin Tae Hyun announced their engagement in December 2014 and tied the knot in July 2015. This celebrated couple adopted a daughter after experiencing two miscarriages. 7. Kim Bum and Moon Geun Young Kim Bum and Moon Geun Young became a real life duo after starring in the 2013 drama Goddess of Fire. However, they only dated for seven months and announced their split to focus on their individual careers. 8. Lee Min Ho and Park Min Young A couple everyone was rooting for, Lee Min Ho and Park Min Young dated after filming City Hunter together. They went public with their relationship in August 2011 but announced their breakup the following year. 9. Ahn Jae Hyun and Koo Hye Sun The pair starred together in the 2015 drama Blood. Since then, they were often spotted together offscreen. They tied the knot in May 2016 in Jeju Island and later starred in Newlyweds Diary in 2017. However, in August 2019, Koo Hye Sun revealed on Instagram that Ahn Jae Hyun asked for a divorce right after his birthday. She posted text messages between them which highlighted troubles in their marriage. Later, Hye Sun also announced her retirement from the Korean film industry. In July 2020, it was announced that the couple was finally divorced. 10. Ji Sung and Lee Bo Young Save Last Dance For Me stars Ji Sung and Lee Bo Young announced their engagement by posting handwritten notes on their official fansites. The couple recently celebrated their 10th wedding anniversary. They also share two kids, a daughter and a son. 11. Lee Joon and Jung So Min Lee Joon and Jung So Min began dating in October 2017 after starring together in the K-drama Father is Strange. They dated for three years and parted ways in 2020. Their agencies confirmed that they remain on good terms and have decided to cheer for each other as colleagues. 12. Lee Joon Gi and Jeon Hye Bin Lee Joon Gi and Jeon Hye Bin started dating after starring in the 2014 drama Gunman in Joseon. They confirmed their relationship in 2016 but parted ways the following year.13. Joo Sang-Wook and Cha Ye-Ryun The leads of Glamorous Temptation (2015) met and fell in love while filming and exchanged vows in May 2017. Cha Ye-ryun once playfully told her husband they were done if he didn't want to marry her, a bold move that led to him proposing. They are known as a popular celebrity couple and often appear at events together. They have appeared on various entertainment programs, sharing details about their lives. 14. Kim Woo Bin and Shin Min Ah South Korean stars Shin Min Ah and Kim Woo Bin are finally tying the knot after a decade of togetherness. The two first met during a fashion brand campaign in 2015 where a simple work meeting slowly turned into a real connection. They confirmed their relationship the same year and fans instantly loved their calm and easy chemistry. Their bond grew even stronger when Woo Bin faced a major health challenge and Min Ah stayed by his side throughout his recovery. The couple has always kept things private but their steady support for each other continues to make them one of the most admired real life pairs in the Korean entertainment world. 15. Ryu Soo Young and Park Ha Sun Ryu Soo Young and Park Ha Sun met while working on the drama Two Weeks in 2013 and gradually became close friends before falling for each other. They confirmed their relationship in 2015 and soon won fans over with their warm and grounded pairing. They married in 2017 and later welcomed a daughter who completed their sweet little family. Park Ha Sun often shares glimpses from their daily life, showing Ryu Soo Young’s fun and caring nature which makes their bond even more admired. Here are 15 reel-life duos from K-dramas who went on to become real-life couples. Also Read: K-Pop Idols Named In Party Scandal: ASTRO, ENHYPEN, The Boyz & More。 On a balmy summer day in mid-August of 2021, the 20-year US-led nation-building project in Afghanistan came to an abrupt end. Following a 10-day blitzkrieg offensive in which the Taliban* captured 32 of the country’s 34 provinces with little resistance, the militants encircled and then entered Kabul and caused its government to flee, all while US and coalition forces, diplomats, and intelligence agents were still evacuating.,Afghanistan has been mired in foreign-backed civil conflict for generations, with the US-led invasion of the country in 2001 ensuing 23 years after the CIA kicked off Operation Cyclone - a covert action involving the deployment of jihadist fighters and tens of billions of dollars’ worth of weapons and cash to Afghanistan to fight a fledgling Soviet-backed government.,“We have to look at the history – the United States created the Afghan mujahedeen against the Soviet Union, when the Soviet Union came to help Afghanistan…That Islamic fundamentalism which includes Taliban, Mujahideen, ISIS [Daesh]** and others was created by the West,” says Dr. Zalmay Gulzad, a specialist on Afghan politics and professor of social sciences at Harold Washington College in Chicago.,WorldA Tale of Two Withdrawals: Why Soviet and US Pull-Outs From Afghanistan Were So Different18 August 2021, 04:00 GMT,In the mid-1990s, a few years after the end of the Cold War, Zbigniew Brzezinski, national security advisor to President Jimmy Carter, boasted that the overarching goal of the US project in Afghanistan was to “make the Soviets bleed for as much and as long as is possible,” and to coordinate with the intelligence services from the UK, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and other countries to make this happen.,Over four decades on, this strategy remains central to Washington’s calculations, Dr. Gulzad says, comparing US attempts to now use the Taliban to stir up trouble along Russia’s soft underbelly in Central Asia to the NATO proxy conflict against Moscow in Ukraine. Iran is another major target of US geopolitical ambitions, and Washington would like to play on the differences between the Sunni Taliban and the Shia Iranian state to “create problems” for the Islamic Republic, the academic argues.,Taliban Promise Safety for Resistance Leaders Including Ahmad Massoud as They Meet in Tehran10 January, 13:57 GMT,Graveyard of Empires,Brown University’s Costs of War project has calculated that the War in Afghanistan cost the United States alone more than $2.3 trillion, equivalent to $300 million per day for nearly 20 straight years. Notwithstanding the extravagant spending, and the rotational deployment of over 800,000 US troops and tens of thousands of personnel from over three dozen allied nations over the past generation, the Afghanistan project, once described by Harvard academic and chickenhawk Michael Ignatieff as a “humanitarian” “nation-building lite” adventure, has failed spectacularly.,The causes are legion, ranging from the pervasive corruption of Afghanistan’s political institutions and security structures (whose true fragility was demonstrated in August 2021), to the coalition’s tolerance for and even cooperation with unsavory warlords, drug traffickers, and even child sex criminals, and the imperious nature of the Western-backed project itself.,“It was a lost battle from the beginning,” says Dr. Swasti Rao, an associate fellow at the Europe and Eurasia Center at the Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defense Studies and Analyses in New Delhi.,US 'Lost Track' of Afghan War Aims, Says Retired Marine General12 August, 17:00 GMT,“One of the problems with the US is that it wishes to see the entire world in its own mirror image, what is called the liberal world order comprising of free market and democracy. This approach has a problem when enforced top down without taking account the regional and grassroots realities, cultural sensibilities of the people at hand. The government of Ashraf Ghani was never a popular government with massive charges of corruption that the Afghan people did not identify with,” Rao explains.,The researcher noted that all around the world, but in West Asia in particular, the “project of the liberal order of which the US considers itself a custodian” has met with failure.,“After 20 years, about $2.5 trillion and the lives of its citizens and soldiers, the US realized that retreating is the best possible decision, something they had been planning for a long time,” Rao says.,Challenges, Opportunities,A year on from Kabul’s fall, the situation in Afghanistan is unstable, unpredictable, and dangerous, both for ordinary Afghans and for countries in the region.,“After one year of the US withdrawal from Afghanistan and the Taliban takeover, it is Afghans who are suffering more than any other regional or extra-regional states,” says Shreyas Deshmukh, a researcher with the National Security Program at Delhi Policy Group, an India-based think tank.,“Now it is evident that the Taliban has not given up its extremist tendencies and will continue to stick with its interpretation of the extremist Sharia-based governance model. They do not have any concrete ideas to govern the state because [the Taliban] is a primarily insurgent organization. Therefore, anti-social elements including other terrorist organizations, drug lords, and human traffickers [have been] taking advantage of this vacuum. During the initial months after the Taliban takeover, the level of violence was reduced but now there is an uptick, as anti-Taliban forces are regrouping,” Deshmukh notes.,AfghanistanTaliban Militants Fire Into Air to Disperse Women's Protest in Kabul - Videos13 August, 07:44 GMT,The researcher points to an important dilemma for the Taliban: whether to make concessions on its governance model in exchange for cooperation with, assistance from, and possible recognition from other countries. Such a decision, Deshmukh notes, would carry with it the risk of heightening divisions within the Taliban’s ranks and even raise the possibility of their government’s collapse and renewed civil war. “On the contrary, if they implement a strict interpretation of Sharia law while going against international norms then the country will once again become a haven for terrorist organizations,” he warns.,Dr. Rao concurs with this pessimistic appraisal of Afghanistan’s internal situation, noting that while the Taliban proved capable of taking over from the Western-backed government, “they do not know how to engage in governance per se, let alone [create an] inclusive government with minorities and women. It’s been a year of denial of women’s rights, media crackdown, and retaliatory killings amid mass hunger. Especially with the Taliban bringing back the feared Ministry for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice, enforcing the group’s austere interpretation of Islam, it is more unlikely that women or minorities might have a say in the government any time in the foreseeable future,” he says.,Worse yet, Rao says, if the situation continues to fester, it will cause “even more unrest, drugs and illegal weapons smuggling, bloody fights between various fundamentalist groups like ISIS-K and the Taliban; in short a situation that will remain a regional security [concern] with uncontrolled global ramifications.”,The scholar emphasizes that the international community has asked the Taliban to form an inclusive government, ensure the rights of women and minorities, and guarantee that Afghanistan will no longer serve as a launch pad for global terror operations. “Unless that happens, the trade or investment promised by China will not flow. It is important to note that even Russia and China, which share a better equation with the Taliban compared to the Western world, have not recognized their government,” Rao believes.,WorldLithium, Gold & Rare Earths: How China May Open the Door to New Business Opportunities for Afghans19 August 2021, 08:38 GMT,At the same time, the researcher notes that although the US withdrawal exacerbated regional chaos, landed sophisticated weapons in Taliban hands, and created a regional power vacuum, it also “created space for countries like Russia, China and Iran to play a far more decisive role in the region,” as Washington shifted its attention to Eastern Europe and China.,Deshmukh concurs. “The Taliban is not a designated terrorist organization by many states including the US. However, its leadership is under UNSC and US sanctions. The real question is, will the countries recognize the Taliban regime in the near future? China, Pakistan, Russia, and Qatar have given some signals that they might recognize the regime. However, it remains a risky business considering that the Taliban is continuing close cooperation with terrorist organizations like AQ, Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan and Lashkar-e-Taiba. Many of their leaders have taken safe haven in Afghanistan.”,“No country would like to align itself with this regime and recognize them, for now. Meanwhile, they will continue to engage with the Taliban to provide humanitarian assistance to Afghans, keep a tab on terrorist elements which could threaten the national interest of those countries, and further to reap some economic benefits from Afghanistan,” Deshmukh concludes.,* A group under United Nations sanctions for terrorist activities.,** A terrorist group outlawed in Russia and many other countries.。
二 |
Current article:http://nep9ph.suilaoheirenzhaizhaikang.sbs/list_ye1/a06fskc.html
Published on:05:00:42